
Disclaimer: The News on Speed and Stracey is for general information purposes only to assist our lawyers.
 |
Daniel Wilkie found not guilty |
SECOND ASIC PROSECUTION OF FAI'S DANIEL WILKIE FAILS
On 13 October 2008 in the Supreme Court of New South Wales a jury acquitted our client, Mr Daniel Wilkie, the former Chief Operating Officer of FAI, of all charges laid against him in relation to FAI's financial results released at 31 December 1997. The 12 person jury found unanimously that Mr Wilkie was not guilty of the three separate charges which had been the subject of a six and a half week trial in the Supreme Court.
Mr Wilkie had been again represented by our Director of Commercial Litigation, Hugh Scott, and Ben Giles of our commercial litigation team.
The acquittal came 6 1/2 years after the collapse of HIH and nearly three years to the day after Mr Wilkie was acquitted of earlier charges arising out of the collapse of HIH. Those charges concerned reinsurance contracts entered into in May and June 1998 and their alleged impact on the FAI financial results for June 1998. Our release concerning the earlier acquittal can be accessed at HIH Acquittal for our client.
The acquittal of Mr Wilkie was expected to mark the end of a sustained and aggressive, or in the words of Hugh Scott "totally misconceived", pursuit of Mr Wilkie by ASIC and the Commonwealth DPP.
It is particularly noteworthy that not only have Hugh Scott and Ben Giles managed to secure the only acquittals for persons charged with offences arising out of the HIH collapse (Mr Wilkie's first acquittal included those of his two co-accused in a defence substantially led by Speed and Stracey) but also involved obtaining the payment of Mr Wilkie's defence costs in a landmark High Court of Australia judgment handed down in April 2005.
Hugh Scott said of the acquittal:
"Today represents a great relief for Daniel and his family and another pleasing result for Speed and Stracey -in particular Ben Giles and myself. Over the last 7 years we have been bombarded with hundreds of thousands of documents from a specialist division of ASIC funded with millions of dollars. My client was initially denied indemnity for his defence costs by FAI's insurers which necessitated the commencement of proceedings and ultimately a remarkable and successful appeal to the High Court, all within 7 months from the date indemnity was denied."
Mr Wilkie said:
"My family and I are greatly relieved with this result. I would like to thank all my family and friends who have supported me through this most trying period. In particular I would like to thank the team at Speed and Stracey, Hugh Scott and Ben Giles, and also my barristers Lionel Robberds QC and Murugan Thangaraj, all of whom have believed in me and worked tirelessly, skilfully and artfully in my defence and in looking after my best interests. I could not have asked for more from them."
For further comment contact Hugh Scott: 0418 413 959 or 02 9251 8000
Chronology
|
Alleged conduct 1997 and collapse of HIH March 2001 |
|
December 1997 |
Alleged conduct the subject of the charges against Mr Wilkie |
|
September 1998 |
HIH launched takeover bid for FAI and acquired FAI in early 1999 |
|
March 2001 |
HIH Group collapsed |
|
Royal Commission 2002 |
|
March 2001 |
ASIC commenced investigation into the affairs of various companies within the HIH Group, including FAI |
|
29 August 2001 |
Federal Government established the HIH Royal Commission |
|
|
Hugh Scott of Speed and Stracey lawyers retained to defend Mr Wilkie |
|
Early 2002 |
HIH Royal Commission commenced |
|
April 2003 |
HIH Royal Commission report published |
|
Charges laid 2003 |
|
May 2003 |
Charges laid by ASIC and the Commonwealth DPP against Mr Wilkie for alleged misconduct in relation to the June 1998 financial results of FAI |
|
Mr Wilkie's costs - High Court says insurers to pay - April 2005 |
|
July 2003 |
Mr Wilkie requested consent for the payment of his defence costs under FAI's Directors and Officers Insurance Policy |
|
25 September 2003 |
Insurers denied Mr Wilkie's request for indemnity. On the same day Mr Wilkie commenced court proceedings against those insurers |
|
18 November 2003 |
Supreme Court of New South Wales denied Mr Wilkie indemnity |
|
August 2004 |
In a rarely used legal manoeuvre to get Mr Wilkie funding before his trial in September 2005, Mr Wilkie's lawyers, Speed and Stracey, appealed the Supreme Court decision, by bypassing the Court of Appeal of New South Wales and going straight to the High Court of Australia. The High Court hearing was heard together with an appeal by Jodee Rich in relation to the OneTel matter |
|
7 April 2005 |
The High Court found unanimously in favour of Mr Wilkie requiring his insurers to fund all legal costs he incurred in the defence of the prosecution by ASIC and the Commonwealth DPP. The High Court found unanimously against Mr Rich |
|
First prosecution fails - November 2005 |
|
November 2005 |
The First Prosecution against Mr Wilkie by ASIC and the DPP commenced in September 2005. After a trial lasting 10 weeks Mr Wilkie was acquitted on all charges |
|
Second prosecution starts 1 day later |
|
|
Within 24 hours of his acquittal in November 2005 ASIC and the Commonwealth DPP laid more charges against Mr Wilkie |
|
Second prosecution fails October 2008 |
|
10 October 2008 |
The trial of the second set of charges has been heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales for the last 7 weeks. |
|
|
Today over 10 years after the events alleged occurred and 6 1/2 years after the collapse of HIH a jury has acquitted Mr Wilkie of each of those charges laid by the Commonwealth DPP and ASIC |

|